A FLEXIBILIZATION OF THE HYPOSUFFICIENCY CRITERION IN GRANTING THE CONTINUED BENEFIT BENEFIT (BPC-LOAS)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32813/2179-1120.2020.v13.n3.a675

Keywords:

Continued Installment Benefit, Social Assistance, Economic Hyposufficiency

Abstract

The Federal Constitution of 1988, in order to provide a better living condition for people with disabilities and low-income elderly people, guaranteed the right to receive a monthly minimum wage, derived from the Continuous Benefit Benefit (BPC), also known by the name of the law that regulates it, LOAS. In view of this, the present work aims to analyze the BPC and its concession criteria, giving special focus to the possibility of making the hyposufficiency criterion more flexible, which has generated great repercussion due to disagreements in the doctrine and jurisprudence with the objective requirement provided for in art. 20, §3 of Law 8.742 / 93. The approach was carried out using the deductive method and bibliographic research with a qualitative descriptive character and it was demonstrated, through the presentation of arguments, the historical context of social assistance, the benefit of continued provision and its species and the four theses that defend the flexibility of the criterion of economic under-sufficiency.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BALTAZAR JUNIOR, José Paulo; ROCHA, Daniel Machado da. Comentários à lei de benefícios da previdência social. 5.ed. Porto Alegre: Esmafe, 2005.

BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, de 05 de outubro de 1988.

BRASIL. Decreto 6214/07, de 26 de dezembro de 2007. Disponível em:< http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/D6214.htm>. Acesso em: 29 de maio de 2008.

BRASIL. Lei 8.742, de 07 de dezembro de 1993. Disponível em:< http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L8742.htm>. Acesso em: 28 de maio de 2019.

BRASIL. SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL. STF declara inconstitucional critério para concessão de benefício assistencial a idoso. Disponível em:

<http://www.stf.jus.br/portal/cms/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=236354>. Acesso em: 30 de maio de 2019.

BRASIL. SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL. Rcl 4374, Relator(a): Min. GILMAR MENDES, Tribunal Pleno, julgado em 18/04/2013, ACÓRDÃO ELETRÔNICO DJe-173 DIVULG 03-09-2013 PUBLIC

-09-2013

CALIXTO JUNIOR, Jeferson. “O benefício assistencial como instrumento de defesa da dignidade da pessoa humana”. BuscaLegis. Disponível em : http://www.egov.ufsc.br:8080/portal/conteudo/o-benef%C3%ADcio-assistencial-como- instrumento-de-defesa-da-dignidade-da-pessoa-humana. Acesso em 27 mai. 2019.

CARVALHO, Rogério Tobias de. Imunidade Tributária e Contribuições para a Seguridade Social. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2006.

CASTRO, Carlos Alberto Pereira de, LAZZARI, João Batista. Manual de Direito Previdenciário. 11 ed. Florianópolis: Conceito Editorial, 2009.

LEITÃO, André Studart; GRIECO, Augusto; MEIRINHO Sant’ana. Manual de Direito Previdenciário. 5 ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2018.

MARTINEZ, Wladimir Novaes. Curso de direito previdenciário. 5 ed. São Paulo: LTR, 2013.

MARTINS, Sergio Pinto. Direito da seguridade social. 22 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2005.

OLIVEIRA, Aldemir de. A previdência social na carta magna: análise do direito e antidireito das prestações previdenciárias e assistenciárias. São Paulo: LTr, 1997.

SPOSATI, Aldaíza. A menina LOAS: um processo de construção da assistência social. 3º. ed.. São Paulo: Cortez, 2007.

WEBER, Aline Machado. Critério legal ou a critério do julgador? O benefício assistencial após a declaração, pelo STF, da inconstitucionalidade do art. 20, § 3º, da Lei 8.742/1993. Jus Navigandi, Teresina, ano 19, n. 3875, 9 fev. 2014. Disponível em: <http://jus.com.br/artigos/26660>. Acesso em: 25 de maio de 2019.

ZAMBITTE, Fábio. Curso de direito previdenciário. 8ed. Rio de Janeiro: Impetus, 2006.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-21

How to Cite

Ferreira, I., & Reis, J. (2020). A FLEXIBILIZATION OF THE HYPOSUFFICIENCY CRITERION IN GRANTING THE CONTINUED BENEFIT BENEFIT (BPC-LOAS). Human Sciences Journal - RCH, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.32813/2179-1120.2020.v13.n3.a675

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2020): Human Rights

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Human Sciences Journal - RCH

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The publications of the Human Sciences Journal are registered under the Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY license.

1. The contents of the manuscripts are the exclusive responsibility of their author.

2. It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of manuscripts published in the journal, provided that the source is cited.

3. When submitting their manuscript to the Journal, the authors certify that they are of their own authorship and unpublished (not published in any digital or printed media).

4. The copyright of the articles published in the Journal are of the author, with first publication rights reserved for this journal.

5. For disclosure purposes, the Journal may replicate the works published in this journal in other media, such as social networks (Facebook, Academia.Edu, etc.).

6. The Journal is of public access, therefore, the authors who submit manuscripts agree that they are of free use.

7. In case of any illegality, fraud, or other attitude that puts in doubt the honesty of the publication, especially the practice of plagiarism, the manuscript will be automatically rejected.

8. If the manuscript has already been published, it will be immediately removed from the base of the Journal, its citation linked to the Journal will be prohibited and the cancellation of the referred publication shall be reported in the next issue of the one in which the article was published. In case of the procedure for the withdrawal of the paper the authors will be informed beforehand, being guaranteed the right to a broad defense.

9. The personal data provided by the authors will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication and will not be made available for other purposes or to third parties.