A COLONIAL NARCISISM
historical mplications in surveillance technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32813/2179-1120.2121.v14.n2.a743Keywords:
Coloniality, History, Memory, Technology, Racial Surveillance.Abstract
The purpose of this article is to critically reflect the interference of the legacy of coloniality in surveillance technologies in the European postcolonial space, rehearsing the unveiling of a persistent overlap between these two logics. Based on the analysis of interviews with professionals in criminal and police investigation, forensic genetics, human rights and criminology in the Netherlands, it is intended to argue how surveillance technologies are complexly involved and committed to the historical, political, social and cultural.
Metrics
References
Amelung, N., Granja, R. & Machado, H. (2020). Modes of Bio-Bordering. The Hidden (Dis)Integration of Europe. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
Cohn, B. S., & Dirks, N.B. (1988). Beyond The Fringe: The Nation State, Colonialism, and the Technologies of Power. Journal of Historical Sociology, Vol. 1 No. 2 (June), 224-229. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00011.x
Deen, S. (2018).Tracing Pasts and Colonial Numbness: Decolonial Dynamics in the Netherlands. Etnofoor, vol. 30, no. 2, 11–28.
JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26543126. Accessed 17 Feb. 2021.
Drichel, S. (2018). The disaster of Colonial Narcissism. American Imago. Vol.75, n.3 (Fall), 329-364.DOI: 10.1353/aim.2018.0020
El-Enany, N. (2020). Bordering Britain, Law, Race and Empire, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Essed, P. &, Nimako, K. (2006). Designs and (Co)Incidents: Cultures of Scholarship and Public Policy on Immigrants/ Minorities in the Netherlands. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 47(3-4), 281–312. https://DOI.org/10.1177/0020715206065784
Frijhoff, W. (2010). The Relevance of Dutch History, or: Much in Little? Reflections on the Practice of History in the Netherlands. Low Countries Historical Review, 7-43. DOI: 10.18352/bmgn-lchr.7114
Frosh,S.(2013).Psychoanalysis, colonialism, racism. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33(3), 141–154. https://DOI.org/10.1037/a0033398
Frosh, S. (2016). Relationality in a time of surveillance: Narcissism, melancholia, paranoia. Subjectivity, 9, 1-16. https://DOI.org/10.1057/sub.2015.19
Gandhi, L. (2006). Affective communities: Anticolonial thought, fin-de-siècle radicalism, and the politics of friendship. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Goss, A. (2009). Decent Colonialism? Pure Science and Colonial Ideology in the Netherlands East Indies, 1910-1929. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 40, No.1 (Feb.), 187-214. DOI:10.1017/S002246340900006X.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
Jones, G. (2016). What Is New about Dutch Populism? Dutch Colonialism, Hierarchical Citizenship and Contemporary Populist Debates and Policies in the Netherlands. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37(6), 605-620. https://DOI.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1235025
Khan, S., Can, N., & Machado, H. (no prelo). Racism and Racial Surveillance. London: Routledge.
Khan, S., Sousa, V., & Ribeiro, R. (2020). O Mundo na Europa. Crises e Identidades. Famalicão: Húmus, 2020.
Khan, S. (no prelo). A Alquimia dos Mecanismos de Racialização, Criminalização e Vigilância Racial. In Machado, H. (Org.). Crime e Tecnologia: Desafios Culturais e Políticos para a Europa. Porto: Afrontamento.
Knudsen, B. T., Oldfield, J. R., Buettner, E. & Zabynuan, E. (2021). Echoes of coloniality: New perspectives on Decolonizing European Heritage. New York: Routledge.
Koegler, C., Kumar, P. M. & e Tronicke, M. (2020). The colonial remains of Brexit: Empire nostalgia and narcissistic nationalism. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 56:5, 585-592. DOI: 10.1080/17449855.2020.1818440.
Kohut, H. (2007). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Lowe, L. (2015). History Hesitant. Social Text, Vol.33, no.4, December,85-107. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-3315790
Machado, H, Granja, R. & Amelung, Nina. (2020).Constructing suspicion through forensic DNA databases in the EU. The views of the Prüm professionals. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), 141–159. https://DOI.org/10.1093/ bjc/azz057.
Machado, H. & Granja, R. (2019). Risks and benefits of transnational exchange of forensic DNA data in the EU: The views of professionals operating the Prüm system. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 68,1-7. https://DOI. org/10.1016/J.JFLM.2019.101872
M’charek, A., Schramm, K. & Skinner, D. (2014). Technologies of Belonging. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(4), 459–467.DOI:10.1177/0162243914531149
Mügge, L. (2010). Beyond Dutch Borders Transnational Politics among Colonial Migrants, Guest Workers and the Second Generation. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.
Nimako, K. (2012). About Them but Without Them: Race and Ethnic Relations Studies in Dutch Universities. Human Architecture, 10(1),45–52. ISSN: 1540-5699
Oostindie, G. (2011). Postcolonial Netherlands Sixty-five years of forgetting, commemorating, silencing. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Oudenampsen, M. (2021). The Rise of the Dutch New Right. An Intellectual History of the Rightward Shift in Dutch Politics. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
Riemen, R. (2012). O Eterno Retorno do Fascismo. Lisboa: Bizâncio, 2012.
Santos, B. S. (2002). Between Prospero and Caliban: Colonialism, Postcolonialism, and Inter-Identity. Luso-Brazilian Review, Vol.39, n.2 (Winter), 9-43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3513784
Santos, B. S. (2007). Para além do Pensamento Abissal: Das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 78 (Outubro), 2007, p.3-46. DOI: 10.4000/rccs.753
Sardar, Z. (2008). I think it would be good if certain things were said: Fanon and the epidemiology of oppression. In Fanon, F., Black skin, white masks (pp.vi-xx). C.L. Markmann, trad. New York: Pluto Press.
Shaw, D. (2014). Traumatic Narcissism: Relational Systems of Subjugation. New York: Routledge.
Simmons, D. (2007). The narcissism of empire: Loss, rage and revenge in Thomas De Quincey, Robert Louis Stevenson, Arthur Conan Coyle, Rudyard Kipling and Isak Dinesen. Brighton and Portland: Sussex Academic Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1993). Echo. New Literary, 24(1),17-43.DOI.org/10.2307/469267.
Toom, V., Granja, R. & Ludwig, A. (2019).The Prüm Decisions as an aspirational regime: reviewing a decade of cross-border exchange and comparison of forensic DNA data. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 41, 50-57. Doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.023
Trafford, J. (2021). The Empire at Home Internal Colonies and the End of Britain. London: Pluto Press.
Veldhuizen, T. S., Maas, R., Horselenberg, R. & Van Koopen, P. (2018). Establishing Origin: Analysing the Questions Asked in Asylum Interviews. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25:2, 283-302, DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1376607.
Warwick, A. (2002).Introduction. Postcolonial Technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 32/5-6 (October-December), 643-658. JSTOR,www.jstor.org/stable/3183050. Accessed 17 Feb. 2021.
Weiner, M. (2014). The Ideologically Colonized Metropole: Dutch Racism and Racist Denial’, Sociology Compass, 8/6, 731–744. https://DOI.org/10.1111/soc4.12163.
Wekker, G. (2016). White Innocence. Paradoxes of Colonialism and Race. London & Durham: Duke University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Human Sciences Journal - RCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publications of the Human Sciences Journal are registered under the Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY license.
1. The contents of the manuscripts are the exclusive responsibility of their author.
2. It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of manuscripts published in the journal, provided that the source is cited.
3. When submitting their manuscript to the Journal, the authors certify that they are of their own authorship and unpublished (not published in any digital or printed media).
4. The copyright of the articles published in the Journal are of the author, with first publication rights reserved for this journal.
5. For disclosure purposes, the Journal may replicate the works published in this journal in other media, such as social networks (Facebook, Academia.Edu, etc.).
6. The Journal is of public access, therefore, the authors who submit manuscripts agree that they are of free use.
7. In case of any illegality, fraud, or other attitude that puts in doubt the honesty of the publication, especially the practice of plagiarism, the manuscript will be automatically rejected.
8. If the manuscript has already been published, it will be immediately removed from the base of the Journal, its citation linked to the Journal will be prohibited and the cancellation of the referred publication shall be reported in the next issue of the one in which the article was published. In case of the procedure for the withdrawal of the paper the authors will be informed beforehand, being guaranteed the right to a broad defense.
9. The personal data provided by the authors will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication and will not be made available for other purposes or to third parties.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
